The BNP on Question Time
There has been a whole lot of debate over the last week or so about the British National Party’s appearance on Question Time.
Now, before I start with my views, I think it important to clarify my particular stance on the subject of the BNP.
First of all, I despise everything the bunch of nasty little shits stand for. Secondly, I’d not lose a minute of sleep if they boarded a plane that mysteriously disappeared over the Bermuda Triangle. I’m not that bothered about their welfare. Thirdly, I think it’s important that I’m allowed to call them a “bunch of nasty little shits” without fear of reprisal.
We kid ourselves that we live in a free society, and we – quite naturally – get very upset when something happens to upset the status quo, particularly when we’ve been relatively content with how quo the status has been.
When the BNP (I can’t bring myself to type out the party’s full name more than once in this entry – I find it offensive that they use the word “British” in their title, as if they represent those of us born or nationalised here)… I’ll start again, as that was far too much of an aside to be easily read: when the BNP won two European Parliamentary seats earlier on this year, I felt ashamed. Not only to be living in the general area where they were elected (“the north”) but also ashamed that nearly a million people in the UK felt that this group of fascist idiots offered more than the other parties running for election. Seriously – how low must the public opinion be of the Tories and Labour, if they’d prefer to allow this bunch of cretinous bigots to represent us in the European parliament!
Now there is outrage that the BNP have been invited to appear on Question Time on the BBC. It is the opinion of many (including a number of close friends of mine) that they should be banned from the programme, as to appear would lend them the appearance of respectability and implied acceptance.
There is a lot of truth in this argument, but the fact remains that the party are a democratically elected body, and if the BBC were to ignore them, just because their policies are offensive to many (not to all, of course – they were elected, after all), or because the BBC has been pressured by other political parties, then this would be tantamount to censorship. It would be the Comics Code all over again – “we don’t mind what you say, as long as we agree with it”. And yes – it’s not art, it’s politics, and it’s an over-simplification, perhaps, but there is truth there.
I hate the BNP with a passion, but if a line is drawn, and they are not allowed the right of free speech, how long before the line is drawn a little closer, and a little closer, until our own opinions are subject to approval before we are allowed to express them? Or we’re not allowed to express them at all?
The BNP are fascists of the lowest order, but as legally, democratically elected members of a legitimate political body, they have a right to express their opinions on the same stage as their competitor parties. I abhor what they say, but as long as no laws are broken, I’ll defend their right to say it.


We are very democratic. The BBC will let the idiots speak on Question Time and defend their right to do so. Democracy is the reason put forward.
However, the BNP are not democratic. ‘When’ they are in power, they say, they will control the media and use it to educate the people to their way of thinking (the antithesis of the chicken and egg scenario: it just ain’t gonna happen).
How can a party that doesn’t believe in free speech, use it to argue that they should be allowed on telly to spout their drivel?
Plus, you know, the Question Time panel usually discusses relevant political issues of the day. Unless they are discussing European policy, what is the point of having the BNP on the programme? I suppose voter apathy might be another thing?
Lots of people are rubbing their hands with glee and hoping Nick Griffin hangs himself on his own stupid rope, but if they really wanted to do that, they should have asked Simon Darby or one of the other neanderthals (oh great, their influence is spreading – I’m being sub-speciesist!). I’m worried that Nick Griffin won’t even look as ranty as Christopher Hitchens.
On the bright side, most of the racists I am aware of are too thick to watch QT and people who are likely to suddenly turn racist who weren’t before are also, I would imagine, not in that programme’s target audience.
I do expect viewing figures to be quite high though. I will make sure I have some (metaphorical) marshmallows for the (metaphorical) bonfire, and my knitting for when they bring out the (metaphorical)gallows. (The knitting is real.)